Civilizational matrix of Russian entrepreneurship

The relevance of the article is caused by the need to restructure the structure of the economy due to the expanding proxy war between the United States and Russia, in which European countries are increasingly involved. This war developed into a tough civilizational war and set a number of tasks for restructuring the economy and reorganizing production. The aim of the work is a new approach to the problem of the development of Russian entrepreneurship, based on the civilizational matrix of the peoples of Russia, in which the non-economic facets of entrepreneurship - morality, culture, spirituality - play an important role. The object of the research is organization of innovation activity. The subject of the research is formation and development of inclusive innovation activity in Russia in the context of bifurcation. The cascade of bifurcations in the country's economy, which has arisen since the collapse of the USSR, has been studied. An analysis has been made of the sanctions policy of Western countries aimed at the comprehensive weakening of the economy and the disunity of Russian society, the destructiveness of this policy for the world community and sustainable development. The United States and the EU, which have managed to turn their monetary units into world currencies, have the possibility of printing their currencies uncontrolled by the world community and throwing their currencies on the world market, regardless of the volume of goods and services they produce, and increasing military spending. The paper also shows the necessity of taking urgent measures to accelerate the development of modern industries in Russia. Institutional development, accelerating the development of creative and adaptive innovations with the release of new exponential technologies and the expansion of public-private partnerships can ensure rapid changes in the structure of the economy, emergence of new industries and modernization of existing enterprises. The necessity of mobilizing intellectual capital and developing inclusive innovation activities in order to ensure the sustainable development of Russia in the face of emerging new challenges has been substantiated. 

1. Yafasov A. Ya., Kostrikova N. A. Problemy transformatsii sotsial'noekonomicheskikh sistem v postCOVID-19-y ekonomike [Problems of transformation of socio-economic systems in the post-COVID-19 economy]. Izvestiya KGTU. 2020, no. 58, pp. 193–207.

2. Yafasov A. Ya., Kostenko L. V. Innovatsionno-investitsionnaya politika razvitiya ekonomiki Kaliningradskoy oblasti v novykh usloviyakh [Innovation and investment policy for the development of the Kaliningrad region economy in the new conditions]. Izvestiya KGTU. 2022, no. 66, pp. 175–194.

3. Vasilev V. Rossiya i Amerika v XXI v.: logika tsivilisovannogo protivostoyaniya [Russia and America in the 21st century: the logic of civilizational confrontation]. Perspektivy. 2022. № 4. Available at: https://www.perspektivy.info/history/rossija_i_amerika_v_xxi_v__logika_civilizacionnogo_protivostojanija_2022-09-16.htm#23 (Accessed 10 February 2023).

4. Putin V. V. Poslanie Prezidenta Federal’nomu Sobraniu 21 fevralya 2023 goda. Available at: http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/70565 (Accessed 22 February 2023).

5. Malinezkiy G. Rossiya i Evropa v zerkale teorii samoorganizatsii [Russia and Europe in the mirror of the theory of self-organization]. Izborskiy klub. Russkie strategii. 2022, no. 9 (107), pp. 74–89.

6. Glaz’ev S. Rossii nuzhna mobilizatsionnaya ekonomika s rynochnym instrumentariem. Intervyu 28.08.2022 g. Available at: https://glazev.ru/articles/165-interv-ju/105820-rossii-nuzhna-mobilizatsionnaja-jekonomika-s-rynochnyminstrumentariem, https://aurora.network/ (Accessed 10 February 2023).

7. Kostrikova N. A., Merkulov A. A., Yafasov A. Ya. Tekhnologiya sinteza raspredelennykh intellektual'nykh sistem upravleniya kak instrument ustoychivogo razvitiya territorij i slozhnykh ob"ektov [Synthesis Technology of Distributed Intelligent Control Systems as a Tool for Sustainable Development of Territories and Complex Objects]. Morskie intellektual'nye tekhnologii. 2017, vol. 1, no. 37, pp. 135–141.

8. Gnatuk V. I, Merkulov A.A., Yafasov A.Ya. Universal’naya model’ organizatsii kak instrument realizatsii tselostnogo podkhoda v upravlenii sotsial’noekonomicheskimi sistemami [Universal model of organization as a tool for implementing a holistic approach to managing socio-economic systems]. Morskie intellektualnye tehnologii. 2018, vol. 2, no. 40, pp. 145–156.

9. Heeks R., Amalia M., Kintu R., Shah N. Inclusive Innovation: Definition, Conceptualisation and Future Research Priorities. Centre for Development Informatics, Institute for Development Policy and Management, SEED. University of Manchester. 2013, 28 p.

10. Angevine C., Cator K., Liberman B., Smith K., Young V. Designing a Process for Inclusive Innovation. A Radical Commitment to Equity. Digital Promise. Asselerating Innovation in Education. 2019. Version 1.0, November 2019, 38 p. Available at: https://digitalpromise.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Designing-a-Process-forInclusive-Innovation.pdf (Accessed 10 Febryary 2023).

11. Schillo R. S., Robinson R. M. Inclusive Innovation in Developed Countries: The Who, What, Why, and How. Technology Innovation Management Review 2017, 7(7): 34–46, http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1089.

12. Gilman M. Defolt, kotorogo moglo ne byt’ [The default, which could not be]. Moscow, Vremya Publ.; 2009, 560. ISBN 978-5-9691-0912-4/.

13. Final Report of the National Commission on the Causes of the Financial and Economic Crisis in the United States. 2011. Official Government Edition the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Submitted by Pursuant to Public Law 111-21 January 2011, 663 р. ISBN 978-0-16-087983-8.

14. Grigoryev L. M., Golyashev A. V., Buryak E. V. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskiy krizis na Ukraine: analiticheskiy doklad. 2014. Analiticheskiy tsentr pri Pravitel’stve Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2014, sentyabr’, 50 p.

15. Majeed A., Zhang X. On the Adoption of Modern Technologies to Fight the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Technical Synthesis of Latest Developments. COVID. 2023; 3(1):90-123. https://doi.org/10.3390/covid3010006.

16. Nureev R. M., Busygin E. G. Ekonomicheskie sanktsii Zapada i rossiyskie antisanktsii: uspekh ili proval? [Western economic sanctions and Russian antisanctions: success or failure?]. Zhurnal institutsional’nykh issledovaniy. 2016, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 6–27.

17. Ukaz ob utverghdenii Konzepzii vneshney politiki Rossiyskoy Federazii 31 marta 2023 goda. Available at: http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/70811. (Accessed 31 March 2023).

18. Shirov A. A. Razvitie rossiyskoy ekonomiki v srednesrochnoy perspektive: riski i vozmozhnosti [Development of the Russian economy in the medium term: risks and opportunities]. Problemy prognozirovaniya. 2023, vol. 2, no. 197, pp. 6–17. DOI 10.47711/0868-6351-197-6-17.

19. Gavrish S. A. [i dr.]. Proryvnye innovatsii: chelovek 2.0: doklad k XXIII Yasinskoy (Aprel’skoy) P816 mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii po problemam razvitiya ekonomiki i obshchestva. NIU VShE, 2022, 56 p. ISBN 978-5-7598-2649-1.

20. Yafasov A. Ya., Maytakov F. G., Kostenko L. V. Kontseptsiya ekosistemy rybokhozyastvennogo kompleksa Rossii [The concept of the ecosystem of the fishery complex of Russia]. Morskie intellektual’nye tekhnologii. 2021, vol. 4, no. 54, pp. 124–134. DOI 10.37220/MIT.2021.54.4.018.

21. Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2476 of 16 December 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. 2022. ST/15263/2022/INIT, OJ L 322I. 16 December 2022, pp. 318–465.

22. The Clash of Civilizations? Huntington S. P. Foreign Affairs. 1993. V. 72. N 3, pp. 22–49.

23. Yafasov A. Ya., Kostrikova N. A. Formirovanie novoy ekosistemy rybokhozyaystvennogo kompleksa Rossii v sovremennykh usloviyakh [Formation of a new ecosystem of the fishery complex of Russia in modern conditions]. Morskie intellektual'nye tekhnologii. 2021, vol. 1, no. 53, pp. 247–254.